A BESA survey shows contractors believe clients still lack understanding of their building safety duties under current UK regulations.
Understanding of legal building safety responsibilities remains remarkably inconsistent among clients, according to new research conducted by the Building Engineering Services Association (BESA). The industry body's survey reveals that engineering contractors routinely find clients lacking clarity over their statutory obligations under modern safety frameworks.
This persistent knowledge gap places additional operational pressure on trade contractors. When project owners and clients fail to grasp their regulatory obligations, responsibility often falls back onto the installers and main contractors to explain duty-holder roles, insist on compliance protocols, and manage liability risks on site.
For independent subcontractors, electricians, and heating engineers, client ignorance regarding duty-holder rules directly increases contractual risk. When clients do not understand safety mandates, they are less likely to budget properly for compliant materials, certified products, or necessary testing regimes. Tradespeople should watch out for attempts by clients to trim project costs on safety-critical hardware, fixings, or fire-rated components. It is essential to ensure every specification meets strict building regulations and that responsibility for signing off compliance is explicitly documented in contracts before work begins.
As regulatory enforcement tightens across the UK, contractors cannot assume clients know the law. Trade businesses should ensure their quotes clearly state the necessary compliance standards, required certifications, and approved materials needed to satisfy building safety regulations, protecting themselves from future liability.
Reported by Construction Management — original article
Price alerts on the kit you're watching, plus the deals our team files each day.
Create a free account
